• Home
  • About
  • Consultancy
  • Contact

The New Dial Tone

Technology & Markets

Unlocking RCS Revenue Potential – I Beg to Differ

May 12, 2015 / in Markets & People / 2 Comments

Last week a post titled Unlocking RCS Revenue Potential was published on The New IP by Mohan Palat from Comverse.

The claim in this post is that until now operators were struggling with a business model for RCS, a lot of investment and hard to make money. The breakthrough as described in the post comes in the shape and form of an RCS API Gateway. This magic box “offers an industry breakthrough, by enabling mobile operators to easily build new IP services, and connect to existing IP services.”

Magic Box

I don’t buy this. Here is why.

The problem of RCS is not that it doesn’t connect to other services. The problem of RCS is twofold:

Technical – Too complicated, trying to standardize everything from protocols to user experience

Business – It competes with free services that use asymmetric business models and don’t charge per message or anything in that sense. They have another way to make money (or get investor funding). That’s why most of the revenue OTTs take from service providers goes to void and therefore successful deployment of RCS will get them nowhere

Comparing to WebRTC

WebRTC is also a standard so we can look at how these 2 technical and business problems of RCS are handled in WebRTC.

Technical

WebRTC defines the bare minimum. Exactly the opposite of what was done for RCS.

In WebRTC only the critical things are standardized, thing required for:

  • Media interoperability – codecs, security, connectivity are defined by the IETF
  • API compatibility – The JS APIs defined in W3C so application will run on different browsers

Business

There is no single answer for what WebRTC is being used for. There are those that just replicate previous services but there are many examples where WebRTC is being used to develop communication as a feature in services that already have a solid business model behind them. Good examples are in verticals such as healthcare, banking, and real estate.

When communication is added as a feature to an existing service, the interconnectivity with other network becomes less important hence, the effort of RCS and this magic box is to the wrong direction.

You may also like:

  • If I Hear of Another New “Cool” WebRTC Talking Heads Service I’m Going to ScreamIf I Hear of Another New “Cool” WebRTC Talking Heads Service I’m Going to Scream
  • AT&T Takes Your Identity to the WebAT&T Takes Your Identity to the Web
  • Service Provider Revenue Not Under The StreetlightService Provider Revenue Not Under The Streetlight
  • VoLTE: Not The Savior In The Eyes Of The Service ProvidersVoLTE: Not The Savior In The Eyes Of The Service Providers

Tagged With: Asymmetric Business Model, RCS, WebRTC

Comments

  1. Dean Bubley (@disruptivedean) says

    May 12, 2015 at 2:24 pm

    Agreed.

    I didn’t respond specifically to Comverse’s RCS post last week. I saw the first line referencing the iPhone & decided it was mostly nonsense.

    I put my own post out on RCS last week – see http://disruptivewireless.blogspot.com/2015/05/rcs-is-still-zombie-technology-28.html

    It’s a zombie technology. Dead, but still shambling about.

    Everyone needs to abandon RCS – loudly and publicly. It needs to die with a bang, not a whimper, and the resouces deployed elsewhere.

    Dean

    Reply
    • Amir Zmora says

      May 12, 2015 at 3:28 pm

      Dean,

      Thanks for supporting this view. And, Yes, that part about the iPhone & RCS was well…not accurate 🙂

      Amir

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe by email
LinkedInTwitter

ABOUT ME

Amir Zmora

Amir Zmora

Blogging about new technology trends and their impact on markets and people.

read more
Follow @AmirZmora

Categories

  • IoT
  • Markets & People
  • Mobile
  • SD-WAN
  • VoIP
  • WebRTC Standards

© 2018 The New Dial Tone

Designed by Katika